ONE-CLICK CASHFLOW Analysis TOOLKIT

Trust vs Personal Ownership: How Land Tax Can Double Overnight

See how each state taxes trusts, compare $1m site value scenarios, and model the weekly cashflow hit inside PropMax.
PropMax dashboard preview

Trust vs Personal Ownership: How Land Tax Can Double Overnight

When investors ask for a trust land tax calculator, what they really want to know is whether a structure that protects assets or shares income will also nuke their cashflow. Each state and territory applies different thresholds and surcharges to trusts, and on a $1 million site value the hit can be dramatic. In this guide we break down the numbers, explain why trust rates exist, and show how PropMax lets you overlay negative gearing calculator outputs with land tax so you can see the full after-tax picture.


Table of Contents


Why Trusts and Land Tax Clash

Land tax thresholds were written long before discretionary trusts became mainstream. States allow a generous tax-free threshold for individuals, but most treat trusts as “foreign” or “special” owners. That means:

  • Lower or nil threshold for trusts (NSW, VIC, QLD, TAS).
  • Higher marginal rates to discourage asset warehousing.
  • Paperwork requirements (beneficiary nominations, tracing rules, SRO disclosures) with penalties if you forget to lodge.

If you place the same property portfolio into a trust, land tax can double overnight. The goal isn’t to scare you away from trusts but to quantify the holding cost so you can decide whether asset protection, estate planning, or income streaming still justify the structure.


National Comparison: $1 Million Site Value

The table below models a single investment property with a $1 million aggregate site value held in each state. Amounts are rounded using each revenue office’s 2025 (or latest available) schedule. Real bills will vary if you own multiple assets, have exemptions, or qualify for primary production rules, so treat the figures as directional guidance.

StatePersonal Ownership (2025)Trust / Special Trust (2025)Notes
NSW$0 (below $1.075 m threshold)≈ $16,000 (special trusts taxed at 1.6% from the first dollar)NSW is the most extreme example of the threshold advantage.
VIC≈ $4,135≈ $7,050Trust threshold drops to $25k and marginal rates are higher.
QLD≈ $4,500≈ $11,000Trusts/companies use the lower $350k threshold.
SA≈ $3,750≈ $3,750SA currently taxes most structures equally, so differences come from grouping rules.
WA≈ $1,950≈ $1,950Western Australia differentiates by landholder type, but a $1 m SV sits in the same bracket for most owners.
TAS≈ $5,300≈ $7,700Trusts pay the premium surcharge unless a beneficiary nomination is accepted.
ACT & NT≈ $0 – $1,800≈ $0 – $1,800Both territories currently apply the same scale to most ownership types.

Key takeaways

  • NSW and QLD are the biggest spread between personal vs trust.
  • VIC’s trust surcharge is smaller but still adds ~$60 per week to holding costs.
  • SA/WA/territories have minor differences, so the asset protection argument is easier to justify.

Worked Example Inside PropMax

Let’s model a Victorian townhouse with a $1 million site value and $52,000 annual rent.

  1. Duplicate the scenario in PropMax.
  2. Toggle the ownership structure setting between “Personal” and “Discretionary Trust”.
  3. PropMax pulls the relevant land tax schedule and stamps the correct rate into your expenses:
    • Personal name: ~$4,135 per year ($79/week).
    • Trust: ~$7,050 per year ($135/week).
  4. Because PropMax runs the same amortisation, depreciation, and rent numbers in both cases, you instantly see the true delta in net cashflow, IRR, and payback period.

That visibility is impossible in a spreadsheet unless you manually update the land tax line every time you tweak the structure.


Combining Land Tax With Negative Gearing

Many investors lean on a negative gearing calculator to validate their after-tax position. The catch: if your calculator ignores trust surcharges, you could be overstating the benefit by thousands.

Inside PropMax you can:

  • Tag expenses as “deductible” so they flow through the tax module.
  • Compare PAYG refunds for personal ownership (where losses offset your salary) vs a trust (where losses accumulate until future distributions).
  • Export both scenarios to a single client-ready report showing pre-tax and after-tax cashflow with land tax baked in.

When you overlay land tax and negative gearing, the personal name scenario often delivers a bigger immediate tax refund, even if the trust promises an income-splitting advantage later.


When a Trust Still Makes Sense

Despite the higher land tax bill, a trust can still be the right vehicle if:

  • You need robust asset protection from operating risk.
  • You have adult beneficiaries in lower tax brackets who will receive future distributions.
  • Estate planning or succession control requires a corporate trustee.

PropMax makes the trade-off transparent by showing cashflow strain today against the strategic benefits you hope to unlock later.


Action Checklist

  1. Grab site values for every property (rates notice, Landata, RP Data) and confirm which assets are exempt.
  2. Model both structures in PropMax so you can see weekly cashflow differences.
  3. Document trust elections (NSW declaration, VIC LT19A, QLD Form LT23) to avoid penalty rates.
  4. Track cumulative holdings. Adding interstate property can still tip you over your local threshold.
  5. Review annually. When valuations jump, revisit whether properties should be shifted out of the trust or left in personal names.

Land tax is unavoidable, but with the right modelling you can decide whether doubling the bill is an acceptable price for the protections and flexibility a trust provides.

Why use Propmax

Model trust vs personal ownership in minutes

Duplicate scenarios, toggle land tax schedules, and export the results to clients or lenders.

30-Year Investment Property Cashflow Forecasting

Plan with precision. Use our free cashflow calculator to forecast rental income, expenses, equity, and loan impact over 30 years. Built for Australian investors.

  • Interactive 30-year investment property cashflow calculator
  • Visual breakdown of income, outgoings, and capital growth over time
  • Includes equity tracking and principal vs interest repayment flows
  • See cashflow at weekly, monthly, or annual levels
30-Year Investment Property Cashflow Forecasting screenshot

Loan & Repayment Scenario Modelling

Compare interest-only vs principal-and-interest loan types and explore extra repayments or equity release strategies.

  • Loan calculators for IO, P&I, offset and redraw scenarios
  • Visualise interest savings with extra repayments
  • Equity growth forecasting and cash-out potential
  • Built-in repayment timeline and cost breakdowns
Loan & Repayment Scenario Modelling screenshot

Property Depreciation & Tax Benefit Estimator

Estimate depreciation deductions and negative gearing benefits with ATO-compliant calculations.

  • ATO-aligned building and fixture depreciation calculator
  • Immediate vs long-term deduction forecasting
  • See impact on taxable income and net cashflow
  • Factor in property age, build cost and low-value pools
Property Depreciation & Tax Benefit Estimator screenshot

Export Reports as Spreadsheets or PDFs

Export your full property cashflow analysis as Excel (CSV/XLSX) or PDF reports for brokers, partners or tax agents.

  • Download full investment property cashflow spreadsheet
  • Bank-ready PDF reports with income, equity and ROI breakdowns
  • Summarise cashflow and capital growth year-by-year
  • Perfect for loan applications, planners and client handouts
Export Reports as Spreadsheets or PDFs screenshot

Latest blog posts

Deep Dives for Property Investors

Practical calculators, strategy breakdowns, and tax explainers from the PropMax team.

Latest suburb snapshots

Recent Suburb Cashflow & Holding Cost Reports

Explore Free Sample Cashflow & Holding Cost Reports

NSW
Leppington

New South Wales

Investment Property Cashflow and Holding Cost Report - Leppington, New South Wales

View report
NSW
Parramatta

New South Wales

Investment Property Cashflow and Holding Cost Report - Parramatta, New South Wales

View report
VIC
Cranbourne West

Victoria

Investment Property Cashflow and Holding Cost Report - Cranbourne West, Victoria

View report
VIC
Frankston

Victoria

Investment Property Cashflow and Holding Cost Report - Frankston, Victoria

View report
VIC
Frankston North

Victoria

Investment Property Cashflow and Holding Cost Report - Frankston North, Victoria

View report
VIC
Geelong

Victoria

Investment Property Cashflow and Holding Cost Report - Geelong, Victoria

View report
VIC
Heidelberg West

Victoria

Investment Property Cashflow and Holding Cost Report - Heidelberg West, Victoria

View report
VIC
Melton

Victoria

Investment Property Cashflow and Holding Cost Report - Melton, Victoria

View report
VIC
Mordialloc

Victoria

Investment Property Cashflow and Holding Cost Report - Mordialloc, Victoria

View report

Still curious?

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to the most common investor questions about PropMax.

In NSW, VIC, QLD, and TAS the threshold for trusts either resets to zero or drops significantly, so the same $1m site value property can attract $3k – $16k more per year than personal ownership.
Yes. Duplicate the scenario, change the ownership structure, and PropMax loads the correct state schedule automatically so you can compare weekly cashflow and ROI without spreadsheets.
Higher land tax reduces pre-tax cashflow and, inside a trust, losses usually stay trapped until you have future income to distribute. PropMax’s negative gearing calculator shows PAYG refunds for personal ownership vs trusts so you can see the timing difference.
No. South Australia, Western Australia, and the territories currently charge trusts roughly the same as individuals. The big jumps happen in NSW, QLD, VIC, and TAS, so focus your modelling there first.
Each state requires trust declarations (NSW declaration, VIC LT19A, QLD Form LT23, TAS beneficiary nomination). Lodging on time ensures you pay the published trust scale rather than penalty rates.